Home » Labour »

Labour breach electoral law in Ealing Southall

 

Labour breach electoral law

TOM Watson, the Labour MP running the Ealing Southall campaign, has broken electoral law by publishing a false statement about the Conservative Candidate Tony Lit.

Iain Dale exclusively reported the breach on his blog earlier this evening, when Watson claimed on his blog that Tony Lit is not registered to vote.

Watson wrote:

This by-election is getting very surreal. So much so, that I’m beginning to think that the Tories are running a fictional candidate. Yesterday, Andrew Gilligan, in a two page Evening Standard spread on the Conservative candidate wrote “[Tony] Lit does not live in Southall…preferring the leafier environs of the Chiswick-Isleworth border for himself and his young family”. There’s one small political problem with this. There is no Tony Lit registered to vote in Chiswick. I know he only joined the Conservatives last week but running a candidate who isn’t registered to vote strikes me as just peculiar.

The false allegation came at the same time as former Home Office Minister Joan Ryan MP wrote to George Osborne MP, the Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer and General Election Campaign Coordinator, alleging the above.

It seems, however, that Labour have been up to their usual trick of jumping the gun, trying to grab headlines and discredit their oponents in one swoop. The pair jumped too soon before doing their homework.

Tony Lit is registered under his full family name Surinderpal Singh Lit and has voted in every election since he was 18. A letter to this effect has been sent to Ryan and Watson will soon be forced to make an apology on his blog.

The letter has been released to the media.

 

Related Posts

  • No Related Posts
 
 

3 Comments

  1. Phil says:

    Perhaps the reason for the above confusion is the candidate calling himself ‘tony’ when his real first name isnt Anthony or Anthony rather a different name, which is ordinarily not related to ‘tony’ at all. I know people choose english names, but i didnt realise that you could use that name for the purposes of an election. Hence the rationale…

    Also noted your vote post last week asking for a vox-poll of how many people think a candidate should undergo a byelection if they defect. This has now come down which is timely as with seven defections from Labour (albeit council seats), it would have been interesting to see had the issue been to the benefit of the Conservatives how your commentators would have reacted. I personally think all defectors should undergo a by-election by default, as you have stood on a manifesto not as an individual.

  2. Alan Collins says:

    Thank you for your comment, Phil.

    I am inclined to agree with you about by-elections. It is indeed now very topical and I firmly believe that all those who have defected (regardless of Party) should resign as Councillor or MP and fight a by-election. If their community deem them to be effective representatives (which, in the end, is all that matters) then they will have no problems getting re-elected.

  3. southall says:

    Has anyone in the Conservative party heard of “Surinderpal Singh Lit”?

 
 

Leave a Comment