A further warning to Medway motorists

 

In case you didn’t already know, the White Vulture is relentless … and about to multiply!

I would like to offer you all a word of warning: if you feel like doing a good deed for the Vulture, just don’t.

We’ve now learned that the Council intends to buy a second car, perhaps to keep busy on the road (or not as has been photographically proven) whilst the first is busy touring the Medway Schools.

In his Between the Lines column in the Medway Messenger last Friday, David Jones told us about the case of Susan Maxwell, who spotted the Vulture in a busy road in Chatham.

“To avoid hitting the car I pulled over to one side to let it through,” said Susan.

“I thought I was being a considerate motorist. I couldn’t believe it when I received a ticket in the post.

“I went to the council offices to protest and they showed me the picture. I clearly have two hands on the wheel as though I am about to continue driving.”

Unfortunately, that wasn’t the end of the road, so to speak, for Susan Maxwell. As the original ticket had gone missing in the Christmas post, she was being fined a higher amount, all for doing the right thing.

When she explained this to the Council, they changed their minds: they were, in fact, only going to charge her the original amount.

How kind.

 

Related Posts

  • No Related Posts
 
 

1 Comment

  1. Rob says:

    Just a minute.

    The picture of her does not prove she committed a parking violation. This means she is innocent. If you cannot prove someone’s guilt (and in this case you cannot) then they are innocent.

    Funny how the police remember this, but other people (i.e. the council, TV licensing) seem to forget this when it suits them.

    A picture can prove anything.

    Interestingly, red-light cameras take two pictures. They used to take one until one man found that it was impossible to prove he had driven through the light – he claimed he was reversing the other way. They now take two pictures to show you’re moving forwards.

    If this was taken to court, would this one inconclusive picture really be all the evidence needed to prove guilt?

    The car needs to take 360 video footage to stop this happening.

    Also, how many people are in the car? If it is 1, then (s)he must have taken the picture while driving. Is this not driving without due care an attention?!?

 
 

Leave a Comment